Abstract

Research Article

Mapping the Psychosocial: Introducing a Standardised System to Improve Psychosocial Understanding within Mental Health

Matthew Bretton Oakes*

Published: 09 February, 2024 | Volume 8 - Issue 1 | Pages: 012-019

Objective: Psychosocial approaches are increasingly being advocated as an efficacious means of addressing mental health problems. However, with a multitude of complex and varying interpretations present with the use of the term ‘psychosocial’ / ‘psycho-social’ in contemporary discussions of mental health, its application can be vague and even contradictory. This presents problems for research to inform practice and practice to inform research, ultimately inhibiting the help given to those suffering. 
Method: Literary review, reflecting an extended period of 10 years, explores and analyses the use of the terms ‘psychosocial’ and ‘psycho-social’ within a mental health context. 
Results: This article identifies that applications and use of the term psychosocial vary significantly, with two models being primarily evident in mental health applications: a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary model. 
Conclusion: A standardised system is established for mental health theorists and practitioners to identify and categorise these different applications. This outcome is intended to lead to a better understanding of different psychosocial applications, provide better communication between existing psychosocial applications, and improve clarity for future instruction.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.apmh.1001051 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

Keywords:

Psychosocial; Psycho-social; Multidisciplinary; Interdisciplinary; Mental health

References

  1. Paris J. Over Diagnosis in Psychiatry: How modern psychiatry lost its way while creating a diagnosis for almost all of life’s misfortunes. Oxford University Press: UK. 2015.
  2. Walker S. Psychosocial Intervention in Mental Health Nursing. Sage Publications: UK. 2015.
  3. Bell R. [Public Health England] Psychosocial pathways and health outcomes: Informing action on health inequalities. PHE Publications. 2017. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/647709/Psychosocial_pathways_and_health_equity.pdf accessed 06/07/23.
  4. Trewin M, Linde K. Guidance on the support of mental health social workers working in NHS, independent or integrated services. NHS Health Education England. 2020. https://www.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Guidance%20on%20the%20support%20of%20mental%20health%20support%20workers.pdf Accessed 28.03.23
  5. Hayward R. The invention of the psychosocial: An introduction. Hist Human Sci. 2012 Dec;25(5):3-12. doi: 10.1177/0952695112471658. PMID: 23626408; PMCID: PMC3627511.
  6. Dobson M, Schnall P, Faghri P, Landsbergis P. The Healthy Work Survey: A Standardized Questionnaire for the Assessment of Workplace Psychosocial Hazards and Work Organization in the United States. J Occup Environ Med. 2023 May 1;65(5):e330-e345. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002820. Epub 2023 Feb 24. PMID: 36827604; PMCID: PMC10171281.
  7. Lincke HJ, Vomstein M, Lindner A, Nolle I, Häberle N, Haug A, Nübling M. COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021 Nov 16;16(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12995-021-00331-1. PMID: 34784940; PMCID: PMC8594291.
  8. VanderWeele TJ. Constructed Measures and Causal Inference: Towards a New Model of Measurement for Psychosocial Constructs. Epidemiology. 2022 Jan 1;33(1):141-151. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001434. PMID: 34669630; PMCID: PMC8614532.
  9. Taylor S, McAvoy J. Researching the Psychosocial: An Introduction, Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2015; 12: 1 – 7.
  10. Jones A. Multidisciplinary team working: collaboration and conflict. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2006 Mar;15(1):19-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2006.00400.x. PMID: 16499787.
  11. Berke J, Fagan M, Mak-Pearce G, Pierides-Müller S. Beyond Madness: Psychosocial Interventions in Psychosis. Therapeutic Communities: UK. 2001.
  12. Clarke S, Hoggett P. Researching Beneath the Surface: Psycho-Social Research Methods in Practice. Karnac: UK. 2009.
  13. Frosh S. (eds). New Voices in Psychosocial Studies Palgrave Macmillan: UK. 2019.
  14. Department of Health and Social Care (2023) Mental health and wellbeing plan: discussion paper. https://www.gov.uk/government/calls-for-evidence/mental-health-and-wellbeing-plan-discussion-paper-and-call-for-evidence/mental-health-and-wellbeing-plan-discussion-paper
  15. England M, Butler A, Gonzalez M. Psychosocial Interventions for Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Framework for Establishing Evidence-Based Standard. The National Academic Press: USA. 2015.
  16. Gravetter F, Forzano L, Rakow T. Research Methods for the Behavioural Sciences. Centage: USA. 2021.
  17. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley Publishing. West Sussex, England. 2008.
  18. Woodward K. Psychosocial Studies: An Introduction. Routledge: UK. 2015.
  19. UWE Bristol, Psycho-social studies and Therapeutic Practices research theme, https://www.uwe.ac.uk/research/centres-and-groups/social-science/research-themes/psycho-social-studies-and-therapeutic-practices
  20. University of London, Birkbeck, Department of Psychosocial Studies, https://www.bbk.ac.uk/departments/psychosocial
  21. Minulescu J. On Becoming a Subject' in Frosh, S. New Voices in Psychosocial Studies. Palgrave Macmillan: UK. 2019; 55 – 71.
  22. Seekles M, Ormandy P, Kamerāde D. Examining patient distress and unmet need for support across UK renal units with varying models of psychosocial care delivery: a cross-sectional survey study. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):e036931. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036931. PMID: 32948556; PMCID: PMC7500306.
  23. NHS England (2014) MDT Development - Working toward an effective multidisciplinary/ multiagency team https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/mdt-dev-guid-flat-fin.pdf
  24. Tambuyzer E, Pieters G, Van Audenhove C. Patient involvement in mental health care: one size does not fit all. Health Expect. 2014 Feb;17(1):138-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00743.x. Epub 2011 Nov 10. PMID: 22070468; PMCID: PMC5060706.
  25. NHS England (2017) Involving people in their own health and care: Statutory guidance for clinical commissioning groups and NHS England. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ppp-involving-people-health-care-guidance.pdf
  26. Galderisi S, Riva M, Girardi P, Amore M, Carpiniello B, Aguglia E, Fagiolini A, Mucci A, Vita A. Schizophrenia and “unmet needs”: From diagnosis to care in Italy. European Psychiatry. 2020; 63(1): 1–11.
  27. Ndibu Muntu Keba Kebe N, Chiocchio F, Bamvita JM, Fleury MJ. Profiling mental health professionals in relation to perceived interprofessional collaboration on teams. SAGE Open Med. 2019 Mar 29;7:2050312119841467. doi: 10.1177/2050312119841467. PMID: 30956791; PMCID: PMC6444404.
  28. Hannigan B, Coffey M. Where the wicked problems are: the case of mental health. Health Policy. 2011 Aug;101(3):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.11.002. Epub 2010 Dec 3. PMID: 21126794.
  29. Moran J. Interdisciplinarity. Routledge: UK. 2002.
  30. Roseneil S. The Ambivalences of Angel's 'Arrangement': a psycho-social lens on the contemporary condition of personal life. The Sociological Review. 2006; 54: 846-868.
  31. The Association for Psychosocial Studies (APS) https://www.psychosocial-studies-association.org/
  32. West L. Distress in the City: Racism, fundamentalism, and a democratic education. IOE Press: UK. 2016
  33. Oakes M. 'Laing in the 21st century: Psychic suffering in the neoliberal landscape' in Frosh, S. New Voices in Psychosocial Studies. Palgrave Macmillan: UK. 2019; 133–148).
  34. Oakes M. Ontological Insecurity in the Post-Covid-19 Fallout: Using existentialism as a method to develop a psychosocial understanding to a mental health crisis. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy. 2023 DOI: 1007/s11019-023-10157-9
  35. Frosh S. The Nature of the Psychosocial. Journal of Psycho-Social Studies. 2014; 8: 1–7.
  36. Erikson E. (1950 / 1995) Childhood and Society. Vintage: UK.
  37. Krishnan A. What are Academic Disciplines? Some observations on the Disciplinarity vs. Interdisciplinarity debate. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. 2009. https://englishtap.co.uk/applications/englishtap/library/AcademicDisciplines.pdf
  38. Hollway W, Jefferson T. Doing Qualitative Research Differently: A Psychosocial Approach. Sage: UK. 2000/2013.
  39. Marcuse H. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Routledge: UK. 1964 / 2002.
  40. Smail D. The Origins of Unhappiness: A New Understanding of Personal Distress. Constable: UK. 1993 / 1999.
  41. Butler J. Gender Troubles: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Taylor & Francis: UK. 1990 / 2011
  42. Fisher M. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Zero Books: UK. 2009.
  43. Laing R. The Divided Self. London: Pelican Books: UK. 1960 / 1966.
  44. Vicary S, Stone K, Hemmington J, Leah C. Research Informed Practice; Practice Informed Research. Practice: Social Work in Action. 2020; 32(4): 247-251.
  45. Thomas J. Editorial. Journal of Psycho-Social Studies. 2013; 7(1): 1–6.

Figures:

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More

Help ?