Review Article

Artificial Intelligence in the healthcare of older people

Elizabeta B Mukaetova-Ladinska*, Tracy Harwood and John Maltby

Published: 20 March, 2020 | Volume 4 - Issue 1 | Pages: 007-013

Clinical applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare are relatively rare. The high expectations in relation to data analysis influencing general healthcare have not materialized, with few exceptions, and then predominantly in the field of rare diseases, oncology and pathology, and interpretation of laboratory results. While electronic health records, introduced over the last decade or so in the UK have increased access to medical and treatment histories of patients, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, immunization dates, allergies, radiology images, laboratory and test results, these have potential for evidence-based tools that providers can use to make decisions about a patient’s care, as well as streamline workflow. In the following text, we review the advances achieved using machine learning and deep learning technology, as well as robot use and telemedicine in the healthcare of older people.

Key points:

1. Artificial Intelligence use is extensively explored in prevention, diagnosis, novel drug designs and after-care.

2. AI studies on older adults include a small number of patients and lack reproducibility needed for their wider clinical use in different clinical settings and larger populations.

3. Telemedicine and robot assisted technology are well received by older service users.

4. Ethical concerns need to be resolved prior to wider AI use in routine clinical setting.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.apmh.1001011 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF


Artificial intelligence; Dementia; Geriatric Medicine; Older People; Healthcare


  1. Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017; 2: 230-243. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29507784
  2. Hargreaves DS, Sizmur S, Viner RM. Do young and older adults have different health care priorities? Evidence from a national survey of English inpatients. J Adolesc Health. 2012; 51: 528-532. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23084177
  3. Lafortune C, Huson K, Santi S, Stolee P. Community-based primary health care for older adults: a qualitative study of the perceptions of clients, caregivers and health care providers. BMC Geriatr. 2015; 15: 57.
  4. Age UK. Briefing: Health and Care of Older People in England 2017. 2017. https://www.ageuk.org.uk/Documents/EN-GB/For-professionals/Research/The_Health_and_Care_of_Older_People_in_England_2016.pdf?dtrk=true
  5. Miotto R., Li L, Kidd BA, Dudley JT. Deep patient: An unsupervised representation to predict the future of patients from the electronic health records. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 26094.
  6. Kickingereder P, Bonekamp D, Nowosielski M, Kratz A, Sill M, et al. Radiogenomics of glioblastoma: Machine learning–based classification of molecular characteristics by using multiparametric and multiregional MR imaging features. Radiology. 2016; 281: 907-918. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27636026
  7. Korfiatis P, Kline TL, Lachance DH, Parney IF, Buckner JC, et al. Residual deep convolutional neural network predicts MGMT methylation status. J Digit Imaging. 2017; 30: 622-628. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785873
  8. Irie R, Otsuka Y, Hagiwara A, Kamagata K, Kamiya K, et al. A Novel Deep Learning Approach with a 3D Convolutional Ladder Network for Differential Diagnosis of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Alzheimer's Disease. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2020. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969525
  9. Costantino G, Falavigna G, Solbiati M, Casagranda I, Sun BC, et al. Neural networks as a tool to predict syncope risk in the Emergency Department Europace. 2017; 19: 1891-1895. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28017935
  10. Ho L, Legere M, Li T, Levine S, Hao K, et al. Autonomic nervous system dysfunctions as a basis for a predictive model of risk of neurological disorders in subjects with prior history of traumatic brain injury: Implications in Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 56: 305-315. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27911325
  11. Pekkala T, Hall A, Lötjönen J, Mattila J, Soininen H, et al. Development of a late-life Dementia Prediction Index with supervised machine learning in the population-based CAIDE Study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 55: 1055-1067. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27802228
  12. Patterson BW, Engstrom CJ, Sah V, Smith MA, Mendonça EA, et al. Training and Interpreting Machine Learning Algorithms to Evaluate Fall Risk After Emergency Department Visits. Med Care. 2019; 57: 560-566. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31157707
  13. Ambagtsheer RC, Shafiabady N, Dent E, Seiboth C, Beilby J. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to identify frailty within a residential aged care administrative data set. Int J Med Inform. 2020; 136: 104094. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32058264
  14. Hatton CM, Paton LW, McMillan D, Cussens J, Gilbody S, et al. Predicting persistent depressive symptoms in older adults: A machine learning approach to personalised mental healthcare. J Affect Disord. 2019; 246: 857-860. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30795491
  15. Nait Aicha A, Englebienne G, van Schooten KS, Pijnappels M, Kröse B. Deep Learning to Predict Falls in Older Adults Based on Daily-Life Trunk Accelerometry. Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18: 1654. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29786659
  16. Dyrba M, Barkhof F, Fellgiebel A, Filippi M, Hausner L, et al. Predicting prodromal Alzheimer’s Disease in subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment using machine learning classification of multimodal multicentre Diffusion-Tensor and Magnetic Resonance Imaging data. J Neuroimaging. 2015; 25: 738-747. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25644739
  17. Rentoumi V, Raoufian L, Ahmed S, de Jager CA, Garrard P. Features and machine learning classification of connected speech samples from patients with autopsy proven Alzheimer's disease with and without additional vascular pathology. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014; 42. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061045
  18. Wang N, Chen J, Xiao H, Wu L, Jiang H, et al. Application of artificial neural network model in diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. BMC Neurol. 2019; 19: 154. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31286894
  19. Davis SE, Lasko TA, Chen G, Siew ED, Matheny ME. Calibration drift in regression and machine learning models for acute kidney injury. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017; 24: 1052-1061. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28379439
  20. Kuo KM, Talley PC, Huang CH, Cheng LC. Predicting hospital-acquired pneumonia among schizophrenic patients: a machine learning approach. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019; 19: 42. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866913
  21. Iluz T, Weiss A, Gazit E, Tankus A, Brozgol M, et al. Can a Body-Fixed Sensor Reduce Heisenberg's Uncertainty When It Comes to the Evaluation of Mobility? Effects of Aging and Fall Risk on Transitions in Daily Living. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016; 71: 1459-1465. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25934996
  22. Corradi JP, Thompson S, Mather JF, Waszynski CM, Dicks RS. Prediction of Incident Delirium Using a Random Forest classifier. J Med Syst. 2018; 42: 261. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30430256
  23. Rahimian F, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Payberah AH, Tran J, Ayala Solares R, et al. Predicting the risk of emergency admission with machine learning: Development and validation using linked electronic health records. PLoS Med. 2018; 15: e1002695. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30458006
  24. Zhong F, Xing J, Li X, Liu X, Fu Z, et al. Artificial intelligence in drug design. Sci China Life Sci. 2018; 61: 1191-1204. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30054833
  25. Lee KS, Park KW. Social determinants of the association among cerebrovascular disease, hearing loss and cognitive impairment in a middle-aged or older population: Recurrent neural network analysis of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (2014-2016). Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019; 19: 711-716. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31257714
  26. Penteridis L, D'Onofrio G, Sancarlo D, Giuliani F, Ricciardi F, et al. Robotic and sensor technologies for mobility in older people. Rejuvenation Res. 2017; 20: 401-410. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28482748
  27. Ozaki K, Kondo I, Hirano S, Kagaya H, Saitoh E, et al. Training with a balance exercise assist robot is more effective than conventional training for frail older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017; 17: 1982-1990. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28295912
  28. Bustamante K, Montes S, Madrigal MDJ, Burciaga A, Martínez ME, et al. Technology-assisted stroke rehabilitation in Mexico: a pilot randomized trial comparing traditional therapy to circuit training in a Robot/technology-assisted therapy gym. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016; 13: 83. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27634471
  29. Forrester LW, Roy A, Hafer-Macko C, Krebs HI, Macko RF. Task-specific ankle robotics gait training after stroke: a randomized pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016; 13: 51. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255156
  30. Chen TL, Bhattacharjee T, McKay JL, Borinski JE, Hackney ME, et al: Evaluation by Expert Dancers of a Robot That Performs Partnered Stepping via Haptic Interaction. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0125179. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4438977/
  31. Güttler J, Georgoulas C, Linner T, Bock T. Towards a future robotic home environment: A survey. Gerontology. 2015; 61: 268-80. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25341658
  32. O'Brien K, Liggett A, Ramirez-Zohfeld V, Sunkara P, Lindquist LA. Voice-Controlled Intelligent Personal Assistants to Support Aging in Place. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020; 68: 176-179. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31617581
  33. Robinson H, MacDonald B, Broadbent E. Physiological effects of a companion robot n blood pressure of older people in residential care facility: a pilot study. Australas J Ageing. 2015; 34: 27-32. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24373064
  34. Abbott R, Orr N, McGill P, Whear R, Bethel A, et al. How do "robopets" impact the health and well-being of residents in care homes? A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Int J Older People Nurs. 2019; 14: e12239. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31070870
  35. Robinson H, Macdonald B, Kerse N, Broadbent E. The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013; 14: 661-667. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23545466
  36. Łukasik S, Tobis S, Wieczorowska-Tobis K, Suwalska A. Could Robots Help Older People with Age-Related Nutritional Problems? Opinions of Potential Users. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30424561
  37. Cortellessa G, Fracasso F, Sorrentino A, Orlandini A, Bernardi G, et al. ROBIN, a telepresence robot to support older users monitoring and social inclusion: Development and evaluation. Telemed J E Health. 2018; 24: 145-154. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28771398
  38. Takaeda K, Kamimura T, Inoue T, Nishiura Y. Reliability and acceptability of using a social robot to carry out cognitive tests for community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019; 19: 552-556. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30884153
  39. Chu L, Chen HW, Cheng PY, Ho P, Weng IT, et al. Identifying Features that Enhance Older Adults' Acceptance of Robots: A Mixed Methods Study. Gerontology. 2019; 65: 441-450. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30844813
  40. Car J, Sheikh A, Wicks P, Williams MS. Beyond the hype of big data and artificial intelligence: Building foundations for knowledge and wisdom. BMC Med. 2019; 17: 143.
  41. Wang S, Bolling K, Mao W, Reichstadt J, Jeste D, et al. Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults' Perspectives. Healthcare (Basel). 2019; 7. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30974780
  42. Wangmo T, Lipps M, Kressig RW, Ienca M. Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders. BMC Med Ethics. 2019; 20: 98. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31856798
  43. Matheny ME, Whicher D, Thadaney Israni S. Artificial Intelligence in health Care: A report from the National Academy of Medicine. JAMA. 2019. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31845963
  44. Miller DD. The medical AI insurgency: what physicians must know about data to practice with intelligent machines. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2: 62.
  45. Char DS, Shah NH, Magnus D. Implementing machine learning in health care - addressing ethical challenges. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378: 981-983. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29539284
  46. Jaremko JL, Azar M, Bromwich R, Lum A, Alicia Cheong LH, et al. Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Artificial Intelligence Working Group. Canadian Association of Radiologists White Paper on ethical and legal issues related to Artificial Intelligence in radiology. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2019; 70: 107-118. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962048


Figure 1

Figure 1

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More